三星正式发布新一代高端旗舰Galaxy S23系列******
2月2日，三星电子正式发布新一代高端旗舰系列产品三星Galaxy S23 Ultra、Galaxy S23+及Galaxy S23，翻开了三星Galaxy智能手机超能体验的新篇章。此次，三星强大的影像系统融合更加先进的AI技术，带来了电影级视频创作等诸多创新功能；搭载的第二代骁龙®8移动平台升级版，不仅具备超强的AI算力，为未来打造的移动游戏特性与超疾速图形处理等，还可为玩家提供持续高能的移动游戏体验。秉承对可持续发展的承诺，三星Galaxy S23系列相比旗下其他手机采用了更多由可回收环保材料制成的零部件，力求通过先进的设计理念造就标杆级的创新体验。
三星Galaxy S23系列三星电子移动通信部门总裁卢泰文表示，三星Galaxy S23系列产品再次刷新行业标准，为用户带来可靠的优质体验。同时，也致力于将强劲的性能、持续的创新与可持续发展的环保理念融为一体，为消费者提供更高、更强的三星Galaxy体验。
2亿像素镜头搭配丰富的创意拍摄体验，令精彩影像不分昼夜
三星Galaxy S23 Ultra能够助力不同拍摄水平的用户轻松定格令人惊叹的画面，可以在不同的光照条件下呈现出超乎想象的画面细节。
三星Galaxy S23 Ultra三星Galaxy S23 Ultra突破性地搭载了2亿自适应像素传感器，令影像体验大幅升级。通过像素合并技术，可同时对多帧图像进行高分辨率处理，让用户轻松捕捉到超精细瞬间。三星Galaxy S23系列创新搭载了具备Galaxy Super HDR技术的自拍相机，支持双核疾速对焦功能。同时，还将前置摄像头的视频拍摄帧率从30fps提升至60fps，令自拍影像的流畅度显著提升。
为满足更多用户专业的拍摄需求，三星Galaxy S23系列带来了一套专属影像工具，能够通过设置更多拍摄选项来更好地展现灵感与创意。升级的Galaxy专属Expert RAW应用程序让用户也可拍摄出单反风格的作品，还能够拍摄出颇具艺术感的多重曝光照片，或使用天文摄影模式清晰地捕捉到壮丽的星空景色。
此次，三星Galaxy S23+与Galaxy S23将外观设计焕然一新，以标志性的悬浮感相机设计实现了全系列设计风格的统一，为Galaxy化繁为简的本真设计翻开新的篇章。
超强性能开拓未来移动游戏体验
对创作者和游戏玩家而言，挑战极限和冲破想象边界，往往需要更先进的技术赋能。此次，三星携手高通进一步优化Galaxy体验，带来迄今为止三星Galaxy最强悍、高效，同时也是骁龙最快的第二代骁龙®8移动平台升级版。三星Galaxy S23 Ultra还搭载了5,000毫安时(典型值)的大容量电池。
为了实现更接近真实的数字化效果，三星Galaxy S23 Ultra还将支持实时光线追踪技术，更早地推动未来移动游戏发展的主流趋势。通过这项技术，手机能够模拟并追踪游戏场景中的光线，呈现更加逼真的场景渲染效果。此外，三星Galaxy S23系列还搭载了更强大的Galaxy散热系统，让用户能够尽情尽兴地长时间驰骋在游戏世界中。
三星Galaxy S23 Ultra搭载6.8英寸(直角)曲面显示屏，并通过减小曲率带来了更平坦宽阔的视野，让用户能够获得生动且色彩丰富的视觉体验。另外，三星Galaxy的增强舒适度功能可调整屏幕的色调和对比度，帮助用户减缓在夜间观看屏幕时造成的眼睛疲劳；新一代Vision booster技术进一步升级，令屏幕在日光环境中的显示效果更加清晰。
秉承可持续发展理念的环保设计
三星Galaxy S23系列在将品质提升到更高档次的同时，依旧践行环保与可持续发展理念。此次，三星Galaxy S23系列相比上代产品，从之前的6个应用于内部的可回收材料组件增至12个，并应用于内部及外部。同时三星Galaxy S23系列采用的回收材料种类，也比旗下其他Galaxy智能手机更多，包括消费前再生铝材和再生玻璃，以及废弃渔网、水桶和PET瓶子等消费后再生塑料。
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
